Abstract

Anesthesia was a blessing to humankind. It is a miracle that simple molecules such as chloroform (CHCl₃), diethyl ether (CH₃·H₂·O·CH₂·CH₃), or nitrous oxide (N₂O) induce a state of unconsciousness where patients can tolerate surgery. The diversity of the structures of these molecules indicates that there are no common receptors. The action of anesthetics is nonspecific and physical. After the demonstration by Meyer and Overton that anesthetic potencies correlate to their solubility into olive oli, the nonspecific lipid theories monopolized anesthesia theories for almost a century. The dominance of lipid theories invited repulsions against the nonspecificity idea. Protein theories that stress receptor bindings became the top mode. Nevertheless, the wide varieties of anesthetic molecules and the wide varieties of responding systems are difficult to reconcile with the specific interaction concept. This article discusses the recent progress and controversies on the molecular mechanisms of anesthesia. Anesthetics are unique drugs in pharmacology. They affect all macromolecules. The only comparable drugs are disinfectants. Both are nonspecific drugs. We use alcohols and phenols to wipe off the injection sites. We do not use penicillin or any other antibiotics for this purpose, because they are specific binders. Interestingly, these two nonspecific drugs opened the window for the modern medicine. (Keio J Med 50 (1): 20-25, March 2001)

[Home][Latest Issue][Past Issues][Search for Articles][Releted Links][About the Journal]
[Editors][Instructions to Authors][Subscription Information][Feed Back]